Devon DeLapp ([info]ddelapp) wrote,
@ 2008-06-24 21:26:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Share this!  Next Entry
Entry tags:hancock, movie review, step brothers

Movie Reviews: Hancock, Step Brothers
Hancock

The first thirty minutes are fun. We meet Hancock, this anti-hero super hero. He's mean, but not too mean -- Will Smith "mean". An annoying kid prods him, says "Hancock. Bad guys?" pointing to a news report of a crime in progress. Instead of the violence or yelling one might expect from a recently roused alcoholic, he asks the kid if he wants a "cookie", then tells him to "beat it." Do people talk like that in real life?

The first criminals are awesome. Penultimate Hollywood bad guys. No personalities, foreign, and indiscriminately spraying the scenery with machine guns. I thought I was in for a good popcorn flick, but the second and third acts bog down with a slew of hard to swallow clichés and a ham-fisted story.

First, the "big reveal" is alluded to heavily with lingering glances between Hancock and a significant other. In scene after scene, it would happen: a close shot of Will Smith, his eyes flitting to this other person, the other person holding his gaze, a meaningful moment (all the other characters oblivious, of course), then both looking away, as though embarrassed or ashamed. When the reveal finally comes, as unexpected as ambulance blaring a siren, there was an audible groan in the theater.

Second, the news reports. The conveniently-timed television news report, imparting some vital piece of info ("This just in, Hancock is hurt downtown!") are a well-known cliché, to the point of parody (Family Guy: "Next up, our special report on convenient news reports. Watch out for that skateboard, Peter."). If there had been some wink to the audience about it, I would have considered them a joke, but they popped up over and over, earnest, bald-faced exposition in a manner that would have embarrassed a first-year film student. Hancock browses the aisles of a liquor store. A TV behind reports that a dangerous criminal has escaped from prison, and then proceeds to give a detailed summary of the criminal's life: what he went to jail for, his education, his famed ruthlessness. Hancock finally selects a product from the shelf, approaches the register, and the report tapers off. And yes, this is the bad guy he fights at the end of the movie. I wish I was joking.

Supposedly there's a much darker, pre-Will Smith draft of the script out there. I was told it includes a scene where Hancock has sex with a woman, but his climax kills her like a shotgun blast. This is why he is so lonely and bitter. I wonder why that didn't make it into the final version...

I think it will do fine business. The film is well produced. The visual effects are great. If what I described above would not annoy you, then I recommend checking out a matinee.


Step Brothers

Just watched it tonight. I don't want to build it up, but I laughed my ass off about 75% of the time, and was having a fine time the other 25%. I predict "Fucking Catalina Wine Mixer" becomes the next hip slogan. I should start printing the ironic t-shirts now -- God knows I missed the boat with "Milk Was A Bad Choice."

You know the filmmakers had fun making this, and it shows up on screen. Will Ferrell and John C. Reilly have natural chemistry. Half the enjoyment for me came from what I was watching, the other half imagining how this would have read on the page, and the inspired lunacy that lead to its creation.

On the other hand, the person I went with thought the entire film was silly, immature, and not funny. I would be in mid-LOL, glance over at her, and she'd be silent, the look on her face that of someone cornered by a talkative drunk at a holiday party.

For fans of the Will Ferrell-Adam McKay-John C. Reilly-Judd Apatow oeuvre, this may be a new high-water mark. I highly recommend it. Also, all the actors do a great job, but Adam Scott is particularly inspired as the douche bag, overachieving younger brother.

Again, I hate building things up, and I feel bad that what I'm about to say may ruin this moment for a few people but, dammit, I need to share: the final scene (post credits) is the funniest thing I have seen in months. Maybe years. I had tears in my eyes. I laughed about it on the ride home, and I'm chuckling as a write about it now. You've been warned.

DISCLOSURE: Prior to Step Brothers, we were given "full access" to the concession stand. Whatever we wanted, all we had to do was ask. And ask we did. Did this dream-come-true sway my opinion of the movie? I don't think so. The combo of white Wild Cherry Slushie, cinnamon pretzel, Reece's Pieces, and Nestle ice cream nuggets turned out to not be as delicious as initially hoped. I bravely muscled through though, somehow.




(9 comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]erik
2008-06-25 07:51 am UTC (link)
Got your txt. Can't wait for Stepbrothers. I'll go see it Friday now! That combination of concession food sounds disgusting. :-(

I'm a little bummed about Hancock... it'll be Peter Berg's first not-great film, at least since his first film, Very Bad Things, which I actually consider a great film, but then again I'm me. The Rundown (one of my favorite action-comedies ever), Friday Night Lights (arguably the best sports movie ever), and The Kingdom (which does a good job of meshing politics with your average suspense-action flick) is a pretty killer trifecta.

(Reply to this)


[info]patrick_bateman
2008-06-25 04:41 pm UTC (link)
For a while, John C Reilly was on his way to becoming a 'serious actor'. Now he has forsaken that for comedy.

I'm not sure how I feel about this.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]ddelapp
2008-06-25 05:56 pm UTC (link)
I must respectfully disagree. John C. Reilly began as a "serious actor" that expanded into bigger comedic parts with more exposure later in his career. Look at his early credits: Casualties of War, Shadows and Fog, What's Eating Gilbert Grape, The River Wild, and of course Boogie Nights and Magnolia. Remember him as the cop who lost his gun? He's a former member of the the Steppenwolf Theater. The man is a thespian's thespian.

The thing is, he has that funny, everyman face and curly, clown hair. He's also gotten much more attention recently for his star roles in comedies (Talladega Nights, Walk Hard, this movie). Honestly though, the man has had an incredible career, without becoming a super famous celebrity. Part of what I like about seeing him act is that I'm not watching Tom Hanks or Cruise or Will Smith playing a role. I'm watching the role.


(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]patrick_bateman
2008-06-25 11:29 pm UTC (link)
You'll find no argument from me about JCR's most excellent filmography; I appreciate his work, especially his collaborations with Paul Thomas Anderson.

I just want him to be able to go back to those earlier, more serious roles now that he's stepped through the Judd Appatow doorway instead of doing Will Ferrell movies the rest of his career.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]brisrealm
2008-06-25 11:29 pm UTC (link)
Agreed - he plays serious very well and has impressed me w/ drama, musical (chicago), as well as his improv skills in comedy (the talladega nights outtakes where he basically one ups will ferrell every take is hilarious).

he is an everyman and an all around talent.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]brisrealm
2008-06-25 11:23 pm UTC (link)
okay now you wanna make me read the draft of "tonight, he comes" we have in the office that has a version of that scene where he hits the ceiling with his climax but doesn't kill the woman...

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]ddelapp
2008-06-25 11:35 pm UTC (link)
I need this script. Immediately!

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]erik
2008-07-01 08:23 pm UTC (link)
I read Ebert's review of Hancock today and he made the same observation you did:

    Embrey the PR whiz brings Hancock home to dinner to meet his wife, Mary (Charlize Theron), and son Aaron (Jae Head). The first time she meets him, Mary gives Hancock an odd, penetrating look. Also the second time and also the third time. OK, OK, already: We get it. One odd, penetrating look after another. They have some kind of a history, but Hancock doesn’t know about it, and Mary’s not talking.
However, he seemed to think the pay-off was fun and not groan-inducing as you cited:

    She has a lot to keep quiet about, although thank goodness, she eventually opens up or the movie wouldn’t have a second half. I will not reveal what she says, of course, because her surprise is part of the fun.
I dunno... I guess I'll give it the benefit of the doubt. Peter Berg is still one of my favorite mainstream directors. Watched Friday Night Lights again last night and remembered why it truly is the greatest sports movie ever.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]ddelapp
2008-07-02 03:02 pm UTC (link)
That sounds about right. Let me know what you think after you see it.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(9 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Image by [info]clover71. Join the contest in [info]remixed!
Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Log in with OpenID Login with Facebook
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…
 
/ DevonDeLapp.com
Journal - Indiana Jones, and the Last Crusade (1989) ddelapp: Movie Reviews: Hancock, Step Brothers

Devon DeLapp ([info]ddelapp) wrote,
@ 2008-06-24 21:26:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Share this!  Next Entry
Entry tags:hancock, movie review, step brothers

Movie Reviews: Hancock, Step Brothers
Hancock

The first thirty minutes are fun. We meet Hancock, this anti-hero super hero. He's mean, but not too mean -- Will Smith "mean". An annoying kid prods him, says "Hancock. Bad guys?" pointing to a news report of a crime in progress. Instead of the violence or yelling one might expect from a recently roused alcoholic, he asks the kid if he wants a "cookie", then tells him to "beat it." Do people talk like that in real life?

The first criminals are awesome. Penultimate Hollywood bad guys. No personalities, foreign, and indiscriminately spraying the scenery with machine guns. I thought I was in for a good popcorn flick, but the second and third acts bog down with a slew of hard to swallow clichés and a ham-fisted story.

First, the "big reveal" is alluded to heavily with lingering glances between Hancock and a significant other. In scene after scene, it would happen: a close shot of Will Smith, his eyes flitting to this other person, the other person holding his gaze, a meaningful moment (all the other characters oblivious, of course), then both looking away, as though embarrassed or ashamed. When the reveal finally comes, as unexpected as ambulance blaring a siren, there was an audible groan in the theater.

Second, the news reports. The conveniently-timed television news report, imparting some vital piece of info ("This just in, Hancock is hurt downtown!") are a well-known cliché, to the point of parody (Family Guy: "Next up, our special report on convenient news reports. Watch out for that skateboard, Peter."). If there had been some wink to the audience about it, I would have considered them a joke, but they popped up over and over, earnest, bald-faced exposition in a manner that would have embarrassed a first-year film student. Hancock browses the aisles of a liquor store. A TV behind reports that a dangerous criminal has escaped from prison, and then proceeds to give a detailed summary of the criminal's life: what he went to jail for, his education, his famed ruthlessness. Hancock finally selects a product from the shelf, approaches the register, and the report tapers off. And yes, this is the bad guy he fights at the end of the movie. I wish I was joking.

Supposedly there's a much darker, pre-Will Smith draft of the script out there. I was told it includes a scene where Hancock has sex with a woman, but his climax kills her like a shotgun blast. This is why he is so lonely and bitter. I wonder why that didn't make it into the final version...

I think it will do fine business. The film is well produced. The visual effects are great. If what I described above would not annoy you, then I recommend checking out a matinee.


Step Brothers

Just watched it tonight. I don't want to build it up, but I laughed my ass off about 75% of the time, and was having a fine time the other 25%. I predict "Fucking Catalina Wine Mixer" becomes the next hip slogan. I should start printing the ironic t-shirts now -- God knows I missed the boat with "Milk Was A Bad Choice."

You know the filmmakers had fun making this, and it shows up on screen. Will Ferrell and John C. Reilly have natural chemistry. Half the enjoyment for me came from what I was watching, the other half imagining how this would have read on the page, and the inspired lunacy that lead to its creation.

On the other hand, the person I went with thought the entire film was silly, immature, and not funny. I would be in mid-LOL, glance over at her, and she'd be silent, the look on her face that of someone cornered by a talkative drunk at a holiday party.

For fans of the Will Ferrell-Adam McKay-John C. Reilly-Judd Apatow oeuvre, this may be a new high-water mark. I highly recommend it. Also, all the actors do a great job, but Adam Scott is particularly inspired as the douche bag, overachieving younger brother.

Again, I hate building things up, and I feel bad that what I'm about to say may ruin this moment for a few people but, dammit, I need to share: the final scene (post credits) is the funniest thing I have seen in months. Maybe years. I had tears in my eyes. I laughed about it on the ride home, and I'm chuckling as a write about it now. You've been warned.

DISCLOSURE: Prior to Step Brothers, we were given "full access" to the concession stand. Whatever we wanted, all we had to do was ask. And ask we did. Did this dream-come-true sway my opinion of the movie? I don't think so. The combo of white Wild Cherry Slushie, cinnamon pretzel, Reece's Pieces, and Nestle ice cream nuggets turned out to not be as delicious as initially hoped. I bravely muscled through though, somehow.




(9 comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]erik
2008-06-25 07:51 am UTC (link)
Got your txt. Can't wait for Stepbrothers. I'll go see it Friday now! That combination of concession food sounds disgusting. :-(

I'm a little bummed about Hancock... it'll be Peter Berg's first not-great film, at least since his first film, Very Bad Things, which I actually consider a great film, but then again I'm me. The Rundown (one of my favorite action-comedies ever), Friday Night Lights (arguably the best sports movie ever), and The Kingdom (which does a good job of meshing politics with your average suspense-action flick) is a pretty killer trifecta.

(Reply to this)


[info]patrick_bateman
2008-06-25 04:41 pm UTC (link)
For a while, John C Reilly was on his way to becoming a 'serious actor'. Now he has forsaken that for comedy.

I'm not sure how I feel about this.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]ddelapp
2008-06-25 05:56 pm UTC (link)
I must respectfully disagree. John C. Reilly began as a "serious actor" that expanded into bigger comedic parts with more exposure later in his career. Look at his early credits: Casualties of War, Shadows and Fog, What's Eating Gilbert Grape, The River Wild, and of course Boogie Nights and Magnolia. Remember him as the cop who lost his gun? He's a former member of the the Steppenwolf Theater. The man is a thespian's thespian.

The thing is, he has that funny, everyman face and curly, clown hair. He's also gotten much more attention recently for his star roles in comedies (Talladega Nights, Walk Hard, this movie). Honestly though, the man has had an incredible career, without becoming a super famous celebrity. Part of what I like about seeing him act is that I'm not watching Tom Hanks or Cruise or Will Smith playing a role. I'm watching the role.


(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]patrick_bateman
2008-06-25 11:29 pm UTC (link)
You'll find no argument from me about JCR's most excellent filmography; I appreciate his work, especially his collaborations with Paul Thomas Anderson.

I just want him to be able to go back to those earlier, more serious roles now that he's stepped through the Judd Appatow doorway instead of doing Will Ferrell movies the rest of his career.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]brisrealm
2008-06-25 11:29 pm UTC (link)
Agreed - he plays serious very well and has impressed me w/ drama, musical (chicago), as well as his improv skills in comedy (the talladega nights outtakes where he basically one ups will ferrell every take is hilarious).

he is an everyman and an all around talent.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]brisrealm
2008-06-25 11:23 pm UTC (link)
okay now you wanna make me read the draft of "tonight, he comes" we have in the office that has a version of that scene where he hits the ceiling with his climax but doesn't kill the woman...

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]ddelapp
2008-06-25 11:35 pm UTC (link)
I need this script. Immediately!

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]erik
2008-07-01 08:23 pm UTC (link)
I read Ebert's review of Hancock today and he made the same observation you did:

    Embrey the PR whiz brings Hancock home to dinner to meet his wife, Mary (Charlize Theron), and son Aaron (Jae Head). The first time she meets him, Mary gives Hancock an odd, penetrating look. Also the second time and also the third time. OK, OK, already: We get it. One odd, penetrating look after another. They have some kind of a history, but Hancock doesn’t know about it, and Mary’s not talking.
However, he seemed to think the pay-off was fun and not groan-inducing as you cited:

    She has a lot to keep quiet about, although thank goodness, she eventually opens up or the movie wouldn’t have a second half. I will not reveal what she says, of course, because her surprise is part of the fun.
I dunno... I guess I'll give it the benefit of the doubt. Peter Berg is still one of my favorite mainstream directors. Watched Friday Night Lights again last night and remembered why it truly is the greatest sports movie ever.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]ddelapp
2008-07-02 03:02 pm UTC (link)
That sounds about right. Let me know what you think after you see it.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(9 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Image by [info]clover71. Join the contest in [info]remixed!
 


Home / Archive / Projects / Design / Contact / About / Site map / RSS / Atom
Copyright © 2001-2007 Devon DeLapp. All rights reserved.